Литература по эндопротезированию тазобедренного сустава

Полный текст:

• Аннотация
• Об авторе
• Список литературы
• Cited By

Изложены классификации дефектов бедренной кости, описаны основные современные методики ревизионного эндопротезирования при асептической нестабильности бедренного компонента и проведена оценка результатов их использования в клинике.

1. Воронцова, Т.Н. Социально-биологическая и клинико-диагностическая характеристика пациентов, перенесших ревизионное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава (по материалам Федерального регистра эндопротезирования крупных суставов конечностей) / Т.Н. Воронцова // Эндопротезирование в России : всерос. сб. науч. статей. – Казань ; СПб., 2005. – Вып. 1. – С. 253–258

2. Корнилов, Н.В. Состояние эндопротезирования крупных суставов в Российской Федерации / Н.В. Корнилов // Эндопротезирование крупных суставов : матер. симп. – М., 2000. – С. 49–52.

3. Неверов, В.А. Ревизионное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава. / В.А. Неверов, С.М. Закари. – СПб. : Образование, 1997. – 112с.

4. Николаев, А.П. Оценка результатов эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава / А.П. Николаев, А.Ф. Лазарев, А.О. Рагозин // Эндопротезирование крупных суставов : матер. симп. – М., 2000. – С. 78–79.

5. Нуждин, В.И. Ревизионное эндопротезирование тазобедренного сустава / В.И. Нуждин, В.В. Троценко, Т.П. Попова, С.В. Каграманов // Вестн. травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. – 2001. – № 2. – С. 66–71.

6. Тихилов, Р.М. Руководство по эндопротезированию тазобедренного сустава / Р.М. Тихилов. В.М. Шаповалов. – СПб. : РНИИТО им. Р.Р.Вредена, 2008. – 301 с.

7. Amstutz, H.C. Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties / H.C. Amstutz [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. – 1982. – N 170. – P. 21–33.

8. Bardou-Jacquet, J. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft / J. Bardou-Jacquet // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. – 2009. – Vol. 95, N 4. – P. 243–248.

9. Bircher, H.P. The value of the Wagner SL revision prosthesis for bridging large femoral defects / H.P. Bircher [et al.] // Orthopade. – 2001. – Vol. 30. – P. 294.

10. BÖhm, P. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years / P. B hm, O. Bischel // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2001. – Vol. 83-A. – P. 1023–1031.

11. Busch, C.A. Fractures of distally-fixed femoral stems after revision arthroplasty / C.A. Busch [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 87-B. – P. 10.

12. Buttaro, M.A. Impacted bone allografts and a cemented stem after failure of an uncemented stem: preliminary results / M.A. Buttaro [et al.] // Hip Int. – 2009. – Vol. 19, N 3. – P. 221–226.

13. Cameron, H.U. Orthopaedic crossfire – stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in opposition / H.U. Cameron // J. Arthroplasty. – 2003. – Vol. 18, N 3. – P. 101–103.

14. D'Antonio, J.D. Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty / J.D. D'Antonio [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. – 1993. – N 133. – P. 133–139.

15. de Thomasson E. Modified Exeter technique in revision hip surgery: does distal fixation of the stem affect allograft transformation? / E. de Thomasson [et al.] // Arthroplasty. – 2005. – Vol. 20, N 4. – P.473–480.

16. Della Valle, C.J. Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty / C.J. Della Valle, W.G. Paprosky // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2003. – Vol. 85-A, Suppl. 4. – P. 1-6.

17. Della Valle, C.J. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification / C.J. Della Valle, W.G. Paprosky // Clin. Orthop. – 2004. – N 420. – P. 55–62.

18. Dohmae, Y. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty / Y. Dohmae [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. – 1988. – N 236. – P. 214–220.

19. Eldridge, J.D. Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting / J.D. Eldridge [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 1997. – Vol. 12. – P. 535–540.

20. Fevang, B.T. Improved results of primary total hip replacement / B.T. Fevang [et al.] // Acta Orthop. – 2010. – Vol. 81, N 6. – P. 649–659.

21. Fink, B. Distal interlocking screws with a modular revision stem for revision total hip arthroplasty in severe bone defects / B. Fink, A. Grossmann, M. Fuerst // J. Arthroplasty. – 2010. – Vol. 25, N 5. – P. 759–765.

22. Flugsrud, G.B. Risk factors for total hip replacement due to primary osteoarthritis: a cohort study in 50,034 persons / G.B. Flugsrud [et al.] // Arthritis Rheum. – 2002. – Vol. 46, N 3. – P. 675–682.

23. Grünig, R. Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis / R. Gr nig, E. Morscher, P.E. Ochsner // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. – 1997. – Vol. 116, N 4. – P. 187–197.

24. Hamilton, W.G. Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: a choice for all seasons / W.G. Hamilton [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2007. – Vol. 22, N 4. – P. 106–110.

25. Havelin, L.I. The Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association: a unique collaboration between 3 national hip arthroplasty registries with 280,201 THRs / L.I. Havelin [et al.] // Acta Orthop. – 2009. – Vol. 80, N 4. – P. 393–401.

26. Haydon, C.M. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of a cemented femoral component. Results at a mean of ten years / C.M. Haydon [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2004. – Vol. 86-A, N 6. – P. 1179–1185.

27. Iorio, R. Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic / R. Iorio [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2008. – Vol. 90-A, N 7. – P. 1598–605.

28. Jafari, S.M. Revision hip arthroplasty: infection is the most common cause of failure / S.M. Jafari [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. – 2010. – N 468. – P. 2046–2051.

29. Kelly, S.J. The use of a hydroxyapatite-coated primary stem in revision total hip arthroplasty / D.J. Kelly, S.J. Incavo, B. Beynnon // J. Arthroplasty. – 2006, – Vol. 21. – P. 64–71.

30. Korovessis, P. High medium-term survival of Zweymuller SLR- Plus stem used in femoral revision / P. Korovessisk, T. Repantis // Clin. Orthop. – 2009. – N 467. – P. 2032–2040.

31. Mahoney, C.R. Femoral revision with impaction grafting and a collarless, polished, tapered stem / C.R. Mahoney [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. – 2005. – N 432. – P. 181–187.

32. Malkani, A.L. Histological and mechanical evaluation of impaction grafting for femoral component revision in a goat model / A.L. Malkani [et al.] // Orthopedics. – 2005. – Vol. 28. – P. 49.

33. Mallory, T.H. Preparation of the proximal femur in cementless total hip revision / T.H. Mallory // Clin. Orthop. – 1988. – N 235. – P. 47–60.

34. Marmorat, J.L. Femoral revision using cemented stem and compacted bone graft: femoral migration analysis / J.L. Marmorat [et al.] // Rev. Chir. Orthop. – 2006. – Vol. 92. – P 125–132.

35. Maurer, S.G. Reconstruction of the failed femoral component and proximal femoral bone loss in revision hip surgery / S.G. Maurer, A.C. Baitner, P.E. Di Cesare // J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. – 2000. – Vol. 8. – P. 354–363.

36. Meek, R.M. Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem / R.M. Meek [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2004. – Vol. 86-A, N 3. – P. 480–485.

37. Moon, K.H. Revision total hip arthroplasty using an extensively porous coated femoral stem / K.H. Moon [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. – 2009. – N 1. – P. 105–109.

38. Moreland, J.R. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems / J.R. Moreland, M.L. Bernstein // Clin. Orthop. – 1995. – N 319. – P. 141–150.

39. Moreland, J.R. Cementless femoral arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 year follow-up / J.R. Moreland, M.A. Moreno // Clin. Orthop. – 2001. – N 393. – P. 194–201.

40. Morrey, B.F. Complications with revision of the femoral component of total hip arthroplasty / B.F. Morrey, B.F. Kavanagh // J. Arthroplasty. – 1992. – Vol. 7. – P. 71–79.

41. Nadaud, M.C. Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty without allograft in severe proximal femoral defects / M.C. Nadaud [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2005. – Vol. 20. – P. 738–744.

42. Oetgen, M.E. Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Zweymuller femoral stem / M.E. Oetgen, M.H. Huo, K.J. Keggi // J. Orthop. Traumatol. – 2008. – Vol. 9, N 2. – P. 57–62.

43. Paprosky, W.G. Minimum 10-year results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty / W.G. Paprosky, N.V. Greidanus, J. Antoniou // Clin. Orthop. – 1999. – N 369. – P. 230–342.

44. Park, M.S. A distal fluted, proximal modular femoral prosthesis in revision hip arthroplasty / M.S. Park [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2010. – Vol. 25, N 6. – P. 932–938.

45. Pekkarinen, J. Impaction bone grafting in revision hip surgery: a high incidence of complications / J. Pekkarinen [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2000. – Vol. 82-B. – P. 103.

46. Pellicci, P.M. Long-term results of revision total hip replacement: a follow-up report / P.M. Pellicci [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 1985. – Vol. 67-A. – P. 513–516.

47. Pinaroli, A. Conservative femoral stem revision: avoiding therapeutic escalation / A. Pinaroli [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2009. – Vol. 24, N 3. – P. 365–373.

48. Raman, R. Revision of cemented hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral component / R. Raman [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2005. – Vol. 87-B. – P. 1061–1067.

49. Sinha, R.K. Long-stem cemented calcar replacement arthroplasty for proximal femoral bone loss / R.K. Sinha, S.Y. Kim, H.E. Rubash // J. Arthroplasty. – 2004. – Vol. 19. – P. 141-150.

50. Sotereanos, N. Revision total hip arthroplasty with a custom cementless stem with distal cross-locking screws: early results in femora with large proximal segmental deficiencies / N. Sotereanos [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2006. – Vol. 88-A. – P. 1079–1084.

51. Stromberg, C.N. A multicentre 10-year study of cemented revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years old- a follow-up report / C.N. Stromberg, P. Herberts // J. Arthroplasty. – 1994. – Vol. 9. – P. 595–601.

52. Suominen, S. Revision total hip arthroplasty in deficient proximal femur using a distal load-bearing prosthesis / S. Suominen, S. Santavirta // Ann. Chir. Gynaecol. – 1996. – Vol. 85, N 3. – P. 253–262.

53. Van der Donk, S. Rinsing morselized allografts improves bone and tissue ingrowth / S. Van der Donk [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. – 2003. – N 408. – P. 302–310.

54. Volkmann, R. Revision arthroplasty – femoral aspect: the concept to solve high grade defects / R. Volkmann [et al.] // Int. Orthop. – 2003. – Vol. 27. – P. 24–28.

55. Weber, M. Femoral revision using the Wagner stem: results at 2–9 years / M. Weber [et al.] // Int. Orthop. – 2002. – Vol. 26. – P. 36–39.

56. Weeden, S.H. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty / S.H. Weeden [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2002. – Vol. 17, Suppl. 3 – P. 134–137.

57. Weiss, R.J. Minimum 5-year follow-up of a cementless, modular, tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty / R.J. Weiss [et al.] // J. Arthroplasty. – 2011. – Vol. 26, N 1. – P. 16–23.

58. Whiteside, L.A. Major femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty treated with tapered, porouscoated stems / L.A. Whiteside // Clin. Orthop. – 2004. – N 429. – P. 222–226

59. Williams, H.D.W. The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years: a study of the first 325 hips / H.D.W. Williams // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2002. – Vol. 84-B. – P. 324–334.

Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.